<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clean-up Efforts Continue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dactylmanor.org/blair/zero/2008/08/19/clean-up-efforts-continue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dactylmanor.org/blair/zero/2008/08/19/clean-up-efforts-continue/</link>
	<description>(It's not defined!)</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 22:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Squish</title>
		<link>http://dactylmanor.org/blair/zero/2008/08/19/clean-up-efforts-continue/#comment-3371</link>
		<dc:creator>Squish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 02:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dactylmanor.org/blair/zero/2008/08/19/clean-up-efforts-continue/#comment-3371</guid>
		<description>LOL I mail stuff to my sister all the time… and yet, because she does the same to me, it’s a net naught.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL I mail stuff to my sister all the time… and yet, because she does the same to me, it’s a net naught.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blair</title>
		<link>http://dactylmanor.org/blair/zero/2008/08/19/clean-up-efforts-continue/#comment-3369</link>
		<dc:creator>Blair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 00:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dactylmanor.org/blair/zero/2008/08/19/clean-up-efforts-continue/#comment-3369</guid>
		<description>You’re welcome! “Mailing stuff to people” is another of my creative approaches to reducing the clutter.

At a quick glance, the “100 items” article is interesting. I like the idea of reducing the amount of “stuff” to a manageable level, but that seems just a little too extreme. And the interpretation where a collection of things only counts as one item could lead right back to where I already am. (Sure, I have 2 zillion books, but they only count as one collection.)

The “mailing stuff” approach seems like a bit more fun. (The nation’s shortage of landfill space could be solved through judicious use of the post office!!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You’re welcome! “Mailing stuff to people” is another of my creative approaches to reducing the clutter.</p>
<p>At a quick glance, the “100 items” article is interesting. I like the idea of reducing the amount of “stuff” to a manageable level, but that seems just a little too extreme. And the interpretation where a collection of things only counts as one item could lead right back to where I already am. (Sure, I have 2 zillion books, but they only count as one collection.)</p>
<p>The “mailing stuff” approach seems like a bit more fun. (The nation’s shortage of landfill space could be solved through judicious use of the post office!!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://dactylmanor.org/blair/zero/2008/08/19/clean-up-efforts-continue/#comment-3368</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 23:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dactylmanor.org/blair/zero/2008/08/19/clean-up-efforts-continue/#comment-3368</guid>
		<description>hey! just got back from vacation and low and behold we have a package from you! thanks for thinking of us when you’re looking to de-clutter! sure cheered up our day. hope things are going well and best of luck on the de-clutter thing.. i just read in time about a dude who’s only trying to have his personal possessions down to 100 items. here’s the article for inspiration:

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1812048,00.html

RAWK!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey! just got back from vacation and low and behold we have a package from you! thanks for thinking of us when you’re looking to de-clutter! sure cheered up our day. hope things are going well and best of luck on the de-clutter thing.. i just read in time about a dude who’s only trying to have his personal possessions down to 100 items. here’s the article for inspiration:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1812048,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1812048,00.html</a></p>
<p>RAWK!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

