<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spellcheck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dactylmanor.org/blair/zero/2008/12/22/spell-check/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dactylmanor.org/blair/zero/2008/12/22/spell-check/</link>
	<description>(It's not defined!)</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 22:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blair</title>
		<link>http://dactylmanor.org/blair/zero/2008/12/22/spell-check/#comment-3960</link>
		<dc:creator>Blair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 23:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dactylmanor.org/blair/zero/?p=979#comment-3960</guid>
		<description>One bit of follow-up on this: Because the spell checker (or, as as a friend more properly describes it, spelling checker) is the one built-in to Firefox, if this issue were sufficiently important to me, I could submit a correction.

Of course, Firefox being an open source product, this would inevitably lead to a tedious discussion of whether product names belong in the dictionary, several dozen exclamations that I would have never encountered this problem had I been using such-and-such obscure design package running on a specific but equally obscure Linux distribution.  (Never mind that I work in a Microsoft shop and hardly have the authority to dictate software preferences to the entire - breathtakingly huge - enterprise.)

The final result would of course be that a different word would end up in the dictionary, but it wouldn't be spelled correctly.

Somehow, this just doesn't strike me as being worth the effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One bit of follow-up on this: Because the spell checker (or, as as a friend more properly describes it, spelling checker) is the one built-in to Firefox, if this issue were sufficiently important to me, I could submit a correction.</p>
<p>Of course, Firefox being an open source product, this would inevitably lead to a tedious discussion of whether product names belong in the dictionary, several dozen exclamations that I would have never encountered this problem had I been using such-and-such obscure design package running on a specific but equally obscure Linux distribution.  (Never mind that I work in a Microsoft shop and hardly have the authority to dictate software preferences to the entire - breathtakingly huge - enterprise.)</p>
<p>The final result would of course be that a different word would end up in the dictionary, but it wouldn&#8217;t be spelled correctly.</p>
<p>Somehow, this just doesn&#8217;t strike me as being worth the effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

